Transforming Minds: A Comprehensive Analysis of Malaysia's National Curriculum Framework and Its Impact on 21st Century Educational Outcomes

Authors

  • Syakimah Abdul Ahmad Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia Author
  • Jayyed Alfaghirah Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia Author

Keywords:

Malaysian education system, curriculum reform, STEM education, 21st century skills, educational policy, pedagogical transformation

Abstract

This study examines the evolution and implementation of Malaysia's national education curriculum, focusing on its alignment with contemporary educational demands and global competitiveness standards. Through systematic analysis of curriculum documents, policy frameworks, and educational outcomes, this research investigates how Malaysia's curriculum addresses the challenges of preparing students for the digital economy while maintaining cultural identity and social cohesion. The findings reveal that Malaysia's curriculum has undergone significant transformations, particularly through the implementation of the Standard Curriculum for Primary Schools and the Standard Curriculum for Secondary Schools, which emphasize higher-order thinking skills, STEM education, and 21st century competencies. However, challenges persist in implementation consistency, teacher preparedness, and resource allocation across urban and rural contexts. This study contributes to understanding curriculum reform processes in developing nations and offers insights into balancing modernization with cultural preservation in educational systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Azman, N. (2016). Enacting assessment for learning in Malaysian schools: Issues and ways forward. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 1-22.

Banks, J. A. (2015). Cultural diversity and education: Foundations, curriculum, and teaching (6th ed.). Routledge.

Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis in communication research. Free Press.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. National Science Teachers Association Press.

Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Multilingual Matters.

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.

Drake, S. M., & Burns, R. C. (2004). Meeting standards through integrated curriculum. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Fosnot, C. T., & Perry, R. S. (2005). Constructivism: A psychological theory of learning. In C. T. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (2nd ed., pp. 8-38). Teachers College Press.

Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.

Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2012). The global fourth way: The quest for educational excellence. Corwin Press.

Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (Eds.). (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. National Academies Press.

Lackéus, M. (2015). Entrepreneurship in education: What, why, when, how. OECD.

Leung, Y. W., & Yuen, T. W. (2012). Beyond the façade of curriculum reform: A case study of citizenship education curriculum policy in Hong Kong. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 32(3), 363-382. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2012.711242

Looney, J. W. (2011). Integrating formative and summative assessment: Progress toward a seamless system? OECD Education Working Papers, No. 58. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5kghx3kbl734-en

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025. Ministry of Education Malaysia.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Mustapha, R., & Abdullah, A. (2004). Malaysia transitions toward a knowledge-based economy. The Journal of Technology Studies, 30(3), 51-61. https://doi.org/10.21061/jots.v30i3.a.7

Muhsyanur. (2022). The CORONA Model in Improving Students’ Scientific Writing Skills: Is it Effective? JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 11(4), 685–697. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v11i4.51589

Muhsyanur, M. (2024). Love-Based Curriculum as a New Paradigm in Language Education : Between Cognition , Affection , and Spirituality. 2(5), 12–19.

Muhsyanur, Rahmatullah, A. S., Misnawati, Dumiyati, & Ghufron, S. (2021). The Effectiveness of “Facebook” As Indonesian Language Learning Media for Elementary School Student: Distance Learning Solutions in the Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Multicultural Education, 7(04), 38–47. https://www.mccaddogap.com/ojs/index.php/me/article/view/8%0Ahttps://www.mccaddogap.com/ojs/index.php/me/article/download/8/10

Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2018). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues (7th ed.). Pearson.

Said, N. E., & Adnan, M. (2017). Integration of ICT in teaching and learning: A review of Malaysian education policies. World Journal of Education, 7(6), 19-28. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v7n6p19

Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411

Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. University of Chicago Press.

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (Expanded 2nd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215

Downloads

Published

2026-01-30

How to Cite

Transforming Minds: A Comprehensive Analysis of Malaysia’s National Curriculum Framework and Its Impact on 21st Century Educational Outcomes. (2026). Global Dialogues in Humanities and Pedagogy, 4(10), 49-60. https://journal.grasglobal.org/index.php/gdhp/article/view/44