Revitalizing Indigenous Knowledge Integrating Local Wisdom into Language and Literacy Curriculum

Authors

  • Daniel Brooks University of British Columbia, Canada Author
  • Mei Lin Simon Fraser University, Canada Author

Keywords:

blended learning, student engagement, higher education, post-pandemic education, Canadian universities, hybrid learning

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic fundamentally transformed higher education delivery models, accelerating the adoption of blended learning approaches across Canadian institutions. This study examines the relationship between blended learning implementation and student engagement in Canadian higher education during the post-pandemic era. Drawing upon contemporary pedagogical frameworks and empirical evidence, this research investigates how Canadian universities have adapted their instructional strategies to maintain and enhance student engagement through integrated online and face-to-face learning environments. The findings reveal that effective blended learning models incorporate strategic technological integration, interactive pedagogical practices, and flexible learning pathways that accommodate diverse student needs. While challenges persist regarding digital equity and faculty preparedness, Canadian institutions demonstrate promising practices in fostering meaningful student engagement through well-designed blended learning ecosystems. This research contributes to understanding how post-pandemic higher education can leverage blended learning to create more inclusive, accessible, and engaging learning experiences for diverse student populations across Canada.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bates, A. W. (2015). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning. Tony Bates Associates Ltd.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. Jossey-Bass.

Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3–21). Pfeiffer.

Kuh, G. D. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 683–706. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0099

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., & Baki, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811311500307

Muhsyanur, S. Y. S. (2023). Deep Learning in Indonesian Language Learning Transforming Educational Paradigms Through Artificial Intelligence. TRICKS : Journal of Education and Learning Practices, 1(2), 49–60. https://journal.echaprogres.or.id/index.php/tricks/article/view/34

Muhsyanur. (2022). The CORONA Model in Improving Students’ Scientific Writing Skills: Is it Effective? JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 11(4), 685–697. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v11i4.51589

Downloads

Published

2024-05-30

How to Cite

Revitalizing Indigenous Knowledge Integrating Local Wisdom into Language and Literacy Curriculum. (2024). Global Dialogues in Humanities and Pedagogy, 2(5), 1-12. https://journal.grasglobal.org/index.php/gdhp/article/view/55