The Relationship between Teacher Autonomy and Instructional Innovation in Scandinavian Schools
Keywords:
teacher autonomy, instructional innovation, Scandinavian education, professional freedom, pedagogical practices, educational reformAbstract
This study examines the relationship between teacher autonomy and instructional innovation within Scandinavian educational systems, specifically focusing on Denmark, Norway, and Sweden. Using mixed-methods research incorporating surveys, interviews, and classroom observations across forty-eight schools, the investigation explores how professional autonomy influences teachers' capacity and willingness to implement innovative pedagogical practices. Findings reveal a significant positive correlation between perceived autonomy and innovation adoption, with teachers reporting high levels of professional freedom demonstrating greater experimentation with digital technologies, student-centered methodologies, and interdisciplinary approaches. The research identifies trust-based organizational cultures, collaborative professional communities, and supportive administrative frameworks as mediating factors strengthening the autonomy-innovation relationship. However, the study also uncovers tensions between individual autonomy and systemic accountability demands, suggesting that autonomy alone does not guarantee innovation without accompanying professional development and resource allocation. These findings contribute to understanding how educational systems can foster teacher-driven pedagogical renewal.
Downloads
References
Blossing, U., Imsen, G., & Moos, L. (Eds.). (2014). The Nordic education model: 'A school for all' encounters neo-liberal policy. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7125-3
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs: Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6), 2134-2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117
Mølstad, C. E., & Karseth, B. (2016). National curricula in Norway and Finland: The role of learning outcomes. European Educational Research Journal, 15(3), 329-344. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904116639311
Muhsyanur and Ramlee Bin Mustapha. (2023). Challenges and Strategies in Teaching Indonesian to Indonesian Occupied Students in Malaysia. TRICKS: Journal Ff Education And Learning Practices, 1(1), 32–39. https://journal.echaprogres.or.id/index.php/tricks/article/view/6
Muhsyanur, Rahmatullah, A. S., Misnawati, Dumiyati, & Ghufron, S. (2021). The Effectiveness of “Facebook” As Indonesian Language Learning Media for Elementary School Student: Distance Learning Solutions in the Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Multicultural Education, 7(04), 38–47. https://www.mccaddogap.com/ojs/index.php/me/article/view/8%0Ahttps://www.mccaddogap.com/ojs/index.php/me/article/download/8/10
Pearson, L. C., & Hall, B. W. (1993). Initial construct validation of the Teaching Autonomy Scale. Journal of Educational Research, 86(3), 172-178. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1993.9941155
Pearson, L. C., & Moomaw, W. (2005). The relationship between teacher autonomy and stress, work satisfaction, empowerment, and professionalism. Educational Research Quarterly, 29(1), 38-54.
Roth, G., Assor, A., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Kaplan, H. (2007). Autonomous motivation for teaching: How self-determined teaching may lead to self-determined learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 761-774. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.761
Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? Teachers College Press.
Thurlings, M., Evers, A. T., & Vermeulen, M. (2015). Toward a model of explaining teachers' innovative behavior: A literature review. Review of Educational Research, 85(3), 430-471. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314557949
Vangrieken, K., Dochy, F., Raes, E., & Kyndt, E. (2017). Teacher autonomy and collaboration: A paradox? Conceptualising and measuring teachers' autonomy and collaborative attitude. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 302-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.021
Walder, A. M. (2017). Pedagogical innovation in Canadian higher education: Professors' perspectives on its effects on teaching and learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 54, 71-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.11.001
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ingrid Larsson, Mikkel Sørensen (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
