Cultural Tourism and Local Language Use in Siem Reap

Authors

  • Sopheap Chan Royal University of Phnom Penh, Cambodia Author

Keywords:

cultural tourism, language preservation, Khmer language, heritage tourism, linguistic adaptation

Abstract

This study examines the intricate relationship between cultural tourism and local language use in Siem Reap, Cambodia, focusing on how tourism development impacts the preservation and evolution of Khmer language practices. Through ethnographic observation, interviews, and linguistic analysis, this research explores how the tourism industry influences language dynamics among local communities surrounding the Angkor Archaeological Park. The findings reveal complex patterns of linguistic adaptation, where local communities navigate between preserving traditional Khmer linguistic heritage and adapting to tourism demands through multilingual competence. The study demonstrates that while tourism creates opportunities for language maintenance through cultural performances and heritage interpretation, it simultaneously introduces challenges related to language commodification and shift. The research contributes to understanding the dual nature of tourism's impact on linguistic heritage in developing nations, offering insights for sustainable tourism planning that balances economic development with cultural preservation. Results indicate that strategic language planning initiatives can harness tourism's potential to support rather than undermine local linguistic diversity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Crystal, D. (2000). Language death. Cambridge University Press.

Garrett, P. (2010). Attitudes to language. Cambridge University Press.

Hinch, T., & Butler, R. (2007). Tourism and indigenous peoples: Issues and implications. Butterworth-Heinemann.

Ledgerwood, J. (2012). Buddhist practice in rural Kandal Province during the 1990s: Continuity and change. In J. Ledgerwood (Ed.), Cambodia emerges from the past: Eight essays (pp. 147-168). Northern Illinois University, Center for Southeast Asian Studies.

Nettle, D., & Romaine, S. (2000). Vanishing voices: The extinction of the world's languages. Oxford University Press.

Muhsyanur, M. (2020). Types and trust system based on the ideology of Bugis community culture on local interest values in cenning rara spells. International Journal of Humanity Studies (IJHS), 4(1), 58–68. https://doi.org/https:/doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.v4i1.2652

Muhsyanur, M. (2023). The Bugis People’s Naming System in Bugis Ethnic Tradition. Journal of Language and Literature, 23(1), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.24071/joll.v23i1.5062

Pink, S. (2015). Doing visual ethnography (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Richards, G. (2007). Cultural tourism: Global and local perspectives. Haworth Hospitality Press.

Salazar, N. B. (2012). Community-based cultural tourism: Issues, threats and opportunities. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 20(1), 9-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2011.596279

Swain, M. B. (1995). Gender in tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 22(2), 247-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-7383(94)00095-6

Thurlow, C., & Jaworski, A. (2010). Tourism discourse: Language and global mobility. Palgrave Macmillan.

UNESCO. (2008). World Heritage Committee decisions. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Cultural Tourism and Local Language Use in Siem Reap. (2025). Global Dialogues in Humanities and Pedagogy, 3(9), 35-43. https://journal.grasglobal.org/index.php/gdhp/article/view/28