Student Perceptions of Philosophy for Children (P4C) in Primary Schools of New Zealand

Authors

  • Hannah Cooper University of Auckland, New Zealand Author

Keywords:

Philosophy for Children, student perceptions, primary education, critical thinking, New Zealand, dialogic pedagogy

Abstract

This study investigates student perceptions of Philosophy for Children (P4C) implementation in New Zealand primary schools. Through a qualitative inquiry involving 120 students from six primary schools across Auckland, Wellington, and Christchurch, the research explores how students experience and value philosophical dialogue in their learning environments. Data collection employed semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, and student-generated reflective journals over a six-month period. Findings reveal that students perceive P4C as enhancing their critical thinking abilities, fostering collaborative learning communities, and developing confidence in articulating complex ideas. Students particularly valued the democratic nature of philosophical inquiry and the opportunity to explore questions without predetermined answers. However, challenges emerged regarding time constraints and varying levels of peer participation. This research contributes to understanding student voice in pedagogical innovation and offers insights for educators implementing dialogic practices in primary education settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alderson, P., & Morrow, V. (2011). The ethics of research with children and young people: A practical handbook. SAGE Publications.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Burgh, G., Field, T., & Freakley, M. (2006). Ethics and the community of inquiry: Education for deliberative democracy. Thomson Social Science Press.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.

Cook-Sather, A. (2006). Sound, presence, and power: "Student voice" in educational research and reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(4), 359-390. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873X.2006.00363.x

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Daniel, M. F., & Auriac, E. (2011). Philosophy, critical thinking and philosophy for children. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 43(5), 415-435. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2008.00483.x

Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. Macmillan.

Fielding, M. (2001). Students as radical agents of change. Journal of Educational Change, 2(2), 123-141. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017949213447

Flutter, J., & Rudduck, J. (2004). Consulting pupils: What's in it for schools? RoutledgeFalmer.

Gregory, M. R. (2011). Philosophy for children and its critics: A Mendham dialogue. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 45(2), 199-219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.2011.00801.x

Gregory, M. R., Haynes, J., & Murris, K. (Eds.). (2017). The Routledge international handbook of philosophy for children. Routledge.

Hemara, W. (2000). Māori pedagogies: A view from the literature. New Zealand Council for Educational Research.

Kennedy, D. (2012). Lipman, Dewey, and the community of philosophical inquiry. Education and Culture, 28(2), 36-53. https://doi.org/10.1353/eac.2012.0014

Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Learning Media.

Murris, K. (2016). The posthuman child: Educational transformation through philosophy with picturebooks. Routledge.

Paris, D., & Alim, H. S. (2017). Culturally sustaining pedagogies: Teaching and learning for justice in a changing world. Teachers College Press.

Reznitskaya, A., & Gregory, M. (2013). Student thought and classroom language: Examining the mechanisms of change in dialogic teaching. Educational Psychologist, 48(2), 114-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2013.775898

Robinson, C., & Taylor, C. (2007). Theorizing student voice: Values and perspectives. Improving Schools, 10(1), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480207073702

Rudduck, J., & Flutter, J. (2004). How to improve your school: Giving pupils a voice. Continuum.

Topping, K. J., & Trickey, S. (2007). Collaborative philosophical enquiry for school children: Cognitive effects at 10-12 years. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(4), 787-796. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709907X193032

Trickey, S., & Topping, K. J. (2004). Philosophy for children: A systematic review. Research Papers in Education, 19(3), 365-380. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267152042000248016

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-30

How to Cite

Student Perceptions of Philosophy for Children (P4C) in Primary Schools of New Zealand. (2024). Global Dialogues in Humanities and Pedagogy, 2(4), 1-10. https://journal.grasglobal.org/index.php/gdhp/article/view/60